In terms of equipment, I am fortunate enough to be involved with Rising Brook Film Collective thus allowing me to borrow other equipment from other members. In this case, I borrowed another camera, a Canon 650D to add different angles and variety to my film, give the audience an increased depth and thus hopefully making the film more interesting. As well as this camera, I used my own Canon DSLR, the 60D.
Canon 60D


Canon 650D

The advances within technology means that, modern day DSLR camera's are extremely capable of capturing high quality, industry standard footage even though the camera itself is relatively affordable. Therefore such technology really helped project, improving the overall image quality and feel of the film - making it appear more professional.
Lenses
Whilst shooting my film, I used various different lenses to capture the image differently and to add variety to my shots.
.jpeg)
As you can see here, the 50mm Canon Lens beautifully captures the subject, using a shallow depth of field, blurring out the background and allowing the audience to view the subject clearly.
Another lens I used was the 24-70mm Wide lens. The Wide lens allowed me to capture moments between my Grandfather and Grandmother, keeping them both in the frame, allowing the audience to observe their connection and love. This lens allows more of the scene to be included within the shot.
The Last Lens I used was the 18-135mm Lens, this lens is quite simply a standard to short telephoto telezoom Lens, allowing me to shoot film from a distance.
Sound
Due to the lack of quality on the built in sound recording system within the DSLR's I used an external mic to record sound. In this case I used the Rode VideoMic. The Rode VideoMic is a directional shotgun mic, therefore perfect for recording interviews and directional sound. Thus making it ideal for documentary filmmaking.
Editing
Editing
I used Final Cut Pro 7 to edit my short documentary. Final Cut is often regarded as industry standard editing equipment and is highly accessible for amateur filmmakers like myself due to its relatively low cost, therefore allowing me to edit my film professionally, using software like this can sometimes greatly improve the final product.
The viewing browser in the top right corner (above) allows me to view the final, edited footage, and the viewing browser in the middle allows me to view original footage, the playback quality within Final Cut is extremely good therefore it gave me a good sense of what my final outcome would be like, allowing me to observe mistakes and successfully correct them.
This image (above) displays the timeline, which consequently shows the sequence of my film. The timeline allows me to not only observe the length of the film, but to adjust clips, add transitions, adjust sound and add captions to various clips. When playing back the edited footage, if you observe mistakes in the viewing browser, you return to the sequence and adjust the issues. The green sequence represents the sound and the blue represents the footage, when altering footage and sound, Final Cut requests you to render the altered footage/sound in order to view it. As you can see, the bottom two sound clips represent the non diegetic sound track, and above that the diegetic sound of the surroundings and live interviews.
Due to my previous experiences with Final Cut, when I came to editing my documentary I felt fairly confident in using it, therefore I could could concentrate more on the film's content, instead of learning how to edit throughout the process. I had initially had difficulty with colour correction, as some of my shots completely differed to others in terms of brightness and colour, making the film seem substandard, therefore in order to develop my knowledge and skills in terms of colour correction in post production I observed various online tutorials, especially made for people in my circumstance.
I also experienced issues in terms of sound quality. However in order to fully change the quality of the sound I would've had to record the original sound again, therefore meaning I would have to re-film interviews with would be time consuming and the quality of the footage might differentiate from before. Therefore I had to edit the sound in post production. Final Cut offers adequate sound editing within the program, however I felt that it was below standard therefore I used Soundtrack Pro to edit the sound.
Within Soundtrack Pro I was able to highlight the unneeded background noise, create a "noise print" then remove the noise using a "noise reduction" application, allowing me to successfully remove most of the background noise out of the recording. Therefore giving my sound a more crisp and professional quality to it.



.jpeg)
.jpeg)








